Nielsen Shuts the Door on P.R.I.S.M.

In-Store Marketing Institute reported today that The Nielsen Company “has suspended plans to launch a syndicated data service on the P.R.I.S.M. initiative.”  P.R.I.S.M. was expected to be the missing link in shopper marketing between practice and quantitative results.

This is disappointing news because it is critical that we create a measurement model in the not too distant future for shopper marketing in order to track the store as a measured media. That would allow all manufacturers and retailers who participate at retail to execute a measured media in the store and compare this to other forms of media. Until we are able to measure the content, compliance, frequency and reach in the store, we do not have a valid measured media discipline. However, this does not prohibit the industry from continuing to grow it’s use of in-store execution as a valuable medium to drive sales volume and brand equity measures.

The need for a P.R.I.S.M.-like model to measure in-store media does not go away. In fact, it increases, given the economy and the need to engage shoppers more than ever.  The need to understand in-store shopper behavior is vital. The need to determine what in-store marketing communications vehicles provide the best return on marketing spend is essential to prudent marketing planning. We must continue industry-wide pressure to create and launch this capability (or something like it) to understand and measure reach by category by retailer. We believe this is critical so that marketers can best align their marketing spend across product categories, brands, geographies and customer segments. To not do this will be a blow to our industry and our profession.

This entry was posted in Activation at Retail, Retail Research and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Posted January 26, 2009 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    The need for measuring the effectiveness and the ROI on in-store promotion still remains. Media channel fragmentation still exists…it did not go away. PRISM was the right idea…wrong execution. The manufacturers embraced the PRISM concept, but the retailers did not. There is now a void that needs to be filled with a “get back to basics” approach. At the end of the day, it comes down to three things: in-store execution, results at the cash register and the analytics to back it up. Look for Miller Zell and its partners to lead the way forward here in the near future.

One Trackback

  1. By Nielsen P.R.I.S.M. Results Released on October 27, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    [...] has been a lot of talk in the industry around the P.R.I.S.M. project undertaken through a partnership between Nielsen and the Insotre Marketing Institute.  The [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
MillerZell